Self-Defense Rights in Your Home

Legally Speaking with Michael Mulligan

Content provided by Michael Mulligan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Michael Mulligan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

11d ago 20:35

MP3•Episode home

What happens when the line between victim and perpetrator blurs in the eyes of the law? When a homeowner confronts a crossbow-wielding intruder or store employees stop a car theft, should they face criminal charges or civil lawsuits for defending themselves and their property?
Barrister Michael Mulligan unpacks the controversial legal landscape of self-defense in Canada, explaining how the 2012 amendments to the Criminal Code created a complex "reasonableness" requirement for those protecting themselves or others. This means that even when facing deadly threats in your own home, the law expects you to consider factors like the relative size, age, and gender of your attacker before responding. As Mulligan notes, "When you're fighting for your life or to save your children, you don't need to worry about weighing up how old this person is and what their gender is."
The discussion extends beyond criminal liability to civil lawsuits, highlighting a case where a self-described "career criminal" is suing grocery store employees who prevented him from stealing a car, claiming they damaged his self-esteem. This mirrors Alberta's experience, where a rancher faced legal action from a thief after firing a warning shot. The provincial response—legislation preventing "criminal trespassers" from suing unless force was "grossly disproportionate"—offers a potential model for other provinces.
The episode also examines a revealing case about Uber's wheelchair accessibility requirements in BC. Instead of mandating accessible vehicles, the government collects a 90-cent fee per non-accessible trip—money that disappears into general revenue while wheelchair users remain unable to use the service. When one wheelchair user won a $35,000 human rights award, the BC Supreme Court overturned it, revealing the tension between regulation and actual solutions.
These cases raise fundamental questions about our legal priorities: Should we better protect those defending themselves and their property? And when regulations like Uber's accessibility fee don't solve the actual problem, what's their real purpose? Listen for an eye-opening look at where our laws might be failing those they're meant to protect.

Follow this link for a transcript of the show and links to the cases discussed.

Chapters

1. Criminal Defense and Self-Defense Laws (00:00:00)

2. Homeowners' Rights Against Intruders (00:05:34)

3. Civil Liability for Protecting Property (00:11:40)

4. Uber and Wheelchair Accessibility Complaint (00:14:10)

5. Human Rights Tribunal Decision Overturned (00:17:49)

274 episodes

#News Talk #News #Government #Michael Mulligan #Law #Legal #Lawyers #Canadian Law #Legal News #Legal News Canada #Legal News British Columbia #Legal News Victoria