Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Leticia Caminero. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Leticia Caminero or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Sealed Code: When Predictive Models Go to Court

22:46
 
Share
 

Manage episode 506559504 series 2806786
Content provided by Leticia Caminero. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Leticia Caminero or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Welcome to a fascinating exploration of the hidden legal battles shaping tomorrow's technology. Predictive algorithms have become the crystal balls of modern business, forecasting everything from home prices to healthcare costs, but they're also becoming the center of high-stakes courtroom dramas worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

Across the globe, from Texas courtrooms to China's Supreme People's Court, judges and juries are answering a profound question: who owns the right to predict the future? The House Canary v. Amrock case resulted in a staggering $600 million verdict over real estate valuation algorithms, while Alibaba secured a 30 million RMB judgment against a company that allegedly scraped its predictive marketing tools. Even industrial applications aren't immune, with companies like Shen Group successfully protecting predictive design software for machinery components.
What makes these cases particularly compelling is how they're redefining intellectual property law. Courts are now recognizing that AI model weights, the mathematical parameters tuned during training, qualify as protectable trade secrets. Data pipelines, prediction engines, and algorithmic structures have all received similar protection. The real drama often unfolds when employees change companies, raising thorny questions about what constitutes general expertise versus proprietary knowledge that belongs to the former employer.
Healthcare prediction presents especially valuable territory, with ongoing battles between companies like Qruis and Epic Systems, or Milliman and Gradient AI, demonstrating how patient data forecasting creates immensely valuable intellectual property. Whether it's forecasting home values on Zillow or optimizing Medicare billing, these predictive tools aren't just convenient features, they're corporate crown jewels worth protecting at almost any cost.
Ready to dive deeper into the invisible rules governing innovation? Subscribe now and join us as we continue to decode the legal frameworks shaping our technological future. The algorithms may predict tomorrow, but who gets to own those predictions? That's what we're exploring on Intangiblia.

Get the book!

Send us a text

Support the show

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Predictive Models as Trade Secrets (00:00:00)

2. House Canary v Amrock Case (00:02:09)

3. China's Ruling on AI Model Weights (00:04:28)

4. Alibaba's Predictive Tool Protection (00:08:14)

5. Industrial Prediction IP Cases (00:10:24)

6. Health and Real Estate Prediction Battles (00:12:29)

7. Fintech and Healthcare Prediction Disputes (00:16:33)

8. Key Takeaways on Predictive IP (00:20:18)

65 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 506559504 series 2806786
Content provided by Leticia Caminero. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Leticia Caminero or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

Welcome to a fascinating exploration of the hidden legal battles shaping tomorrow's technology. Predictive algorithms have become the crystal balls of modern business, forecasting everything from home prices to healthcare costs, but they're also becoming the center of high-stakes courtroom dramas worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

Across the globe, from Texas courtrooms to China's Supreme People's Court, judges and juries are answering a profound question: who owns the right to predict the future? The House Canary v. Amrock case resulted in a staggering $600 million verdict over real estate valuation algorithms, while Alibaba secured a 30 million RMB judgment against a company that allegedly scraped its predictive marketing tools. Even industrial applications aren't immune, with companies like Shen Group successfully protecting predictive design software for machinery components.
What makes these cases particularly compelling is how they're redefining intellectual property law. Courts are now recognizing that AI model weights, the mathematical parameters tuned during training, qualify as protectable trade secrets. Data pipelines, prediction engines, and algorithmic structures have all received similar protection. The real drama often unfolds when employees change companies, raising thorny questions about what constitutes general expertise versus proprietary knowledge that belongs to the former employer.
Healthcare prediction presents especially valuable territory, with ongoing battles between companies like Qruis and Epic Systems, or Milliman and Gradient AI, demonstrating how patient data forecasting creates immensely valuable intellectual property. Whether it's forecasting home values on Zillow or optimizing Medicare billing, these predictive tools aren't just convenient features, they're corporate crown jewels worth protecting at almost any cost.
Ready to dive deeper into the invisible rules governing innovation? Subscribe now and join us as we continue to decode the legal frameworks shaping our technological future. The algorithms may predict tomorrow, but who gets to own those predictions? That's what we're exploring on Intangiblia.

Get the book!

Send us a text

Support the show

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Predictive Models as Trade Secrets (00:00:00)

2. House Canary v Amrock Case (00:02:09)

3. China's Ruling on AI Model Weights (00:04:28)

4. Alibaba's Predictive Tool Protection (00:08:14)

5. Industrial Prediction IP Cases (00:10:24)

6. Health and Real Estate Prediction Battles (00:12:29)

7. Fintech and Healthcare Prediction Disputes (00:16:33)

8. Key Takeaways on Predictive IP (00:20:18)

65 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play