This is a Notebook LM podcast review of Supreme Court opinion concerning a Maryland school board's introduction of "LGBTQ+-inclusive" storybooks into its elementary curriculum and its decision to remove parental opt-out options. The majority opinion, delivered by Justice Alito, finds that the school board's policy unconstitutionally burdens parents' religious exercise by substantially interfering with their right to direct their children's religious upbringing, drawing heavily on the precedent of Wisconsin v. Yoder. Justice Thomas's concurring opinion reinforces this view, comparing the board's actions to historical attempts at ideological conformity that Pierce v. Society of Sisters and Yoder sought to prevent. Conversely, Justice Sotomayor's dissenting opinion argues that mere exposure to ideas, even if conflicting with religious beliefs, does not constitute a Free Exercise Clause violation and warns of administrative chaos for public schools if her colleagues' interpretation of the First Amendment is applied broadly.