Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by David Provan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by David Provan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Ep. 110 Can personality tests predict safety performance?

41:04
 
Share
 

Manage episode 372194897 series 2571262
Content provided by David Provan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by David Provan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The paper reviewed in this episode is from the Journal of Applied Psychology entitled, “A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions” by Beus, J. M., Dhanani, L. Y., & McCord, M. A. (2015).

Discussion Points:

  • Overview of the intersection between psychology and workplace safety
  • How personality tests may predict safety performance
  • Accident proneness theory to modern behaviorism
  • Research on personality and safety performance
  • Personality traits influencing work behaviors
  • The influence of institutional logic
  • Personality tests for safety performance
  • The need for further research and standardized measurement methods
  • Examining statistical evidence linking personality to safety performance
  • Personality traits and their impact on work behavior
  • Analysis of research findings on personality and safety performance
  • The practical implications of the research findings
  • The intriguing yet complex relationship between personality and safety
  • Takeaways:
  • While not total bunk, we definitely don't understand the impact of personality on safety nearly enough to use it as a tool to predict who will or won't make a safe employee
  • There are lots of different ways that we could use personality to get some insights and to make some contributions
  • We need people using those measurements to find out more about the relationship between personality and behavior in different situations in different contexts with different choices under different organizational influences.
  • The answer to our episode’s question – Maybe. It depends. Sometimes, in some places not yet. I don't want to say no, but it's not yes yet either.

Quotes:

I have to admit, before I read this, I thought that the entire idea of personality testing for safety was total bunk. Coming out of it, I'm still not convinced, but it's much more mixed or nuanced than I was expecting. - Drew

If there was a systemic trend where some people were genuinely more accident prone, we would expect to see much sharper differences between the number of times one person had an accident and all people who didn't have accidents. - Drew

I think anything that lumps people into four or five categories downplays the uniqueness of each individual. - David

There are good professionals in HR, there's good science in HR, but there is a huge amount of pseudo-science around recruiting practices and every country has its own pseudoscience. - Drew

Resources:

Link to the Paper

The Safety of Work Podcast

The Safety of Work on LinkedIn

Feedback@safetyofwork

  continue reading

133 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 372194897 series 2571262
Content provided by David Provan. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by David Provan or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.

The paper reviewed in this episode is from the Journal of Applied Psychology entitled, “A meta-analysis of personality and workplace safety: Addressing unanswered questions” by Beus, J. M., Dhanani, L. Y., & McCord, M. A. (2015).

Discussion Points:

  • Overview of the intersection between psychology and workplace safety
  • How personality tests may predict safety performance
  • Accident proneness theory to modern behaviorism
  • Research on personality and safety performance
  • Personality traits influencing work behaviors
  • The influence of institutional logic
  • Personality tests for safety performance
  • The need for further research and standardized measurement methods
  • Examining statistical evidence linking personality to safety performance
  • Personality traits and their impact on work behavior
  • Analysis of research findings on personality and safety performance
  • The practical implications of the research findings
  • The intriguing yet complex relationship between personality and safety
  • Takeaways:
  • While not total bunk, we definitely don't understand the impact of personality on safety nearly enough to use it as a tool to predict who will or won't make a safe employee
  • There are lots of different ways that we could use personality to get some insights and to make some contributions
  • We need people using those measurements to find out more about the relationship between personality and behavior in different situations in different contexts with different choices under different organizational influences.
  • The answer to our episode’s question – Maybe. It depends. Sometimes, in some places not yet. I don't want to say no, but it's not yes yet either.

Quotes:

I have to admit, before I read this, I thought that the entire idea of personality testing for safety was total bunk. Coming out of it, I'm still not convinced, but it's much more mixed or nuanced than I was expecting. - Drew

If there was a systemic trend where some people were genuinely more accident prone, we would expect to see much sharper differences between the number of times one person had an accident and all people who didn't have accidents. - Drew

I think anything that lumps people into four or five categories downplays the uniqueness of each individual. - David

There are good professionals in HR, there's good science in HR, but there is a huge amount of pseudo-science around recruiting practices and every country has its own pseudoscience. - Drew

Resources:

Link to the Paper

The Safety of Work Podcast

The Safety of Work on LinkedIn

Feedback@safetyofwork

  continue reading

133 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play