David Edmonds (Uehiro Centre, Oxford University) and Nigel Warburton (freelance philosopher/writer) interview top philosophers on a wide range of topics. Two books based on the series have been published by Oxford University Press. We are currently self-funding - donations very welcome via our website http://www.philosophybites.com
…
continue reading
Content provided by Audioboom and Emerson Green. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and Emerson Green or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
87 - God & Philosophy of Language (w/ Joseph Lawal)
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 504050980 series 2612571
Content provided by Audioboom and Emerson Green. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and Emerson Green or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Does philosophy of language give us reason to think that God, if he exists, is more like us than classical theists expect? I’m joined by philosopher of language Joseph Lawal to discuss an argument from his paper, 'God An Alien or An Alien God?' His argument aims to push us away from the strongest versions of divine simplicity and aseity, but is also potentially a problem for theistic personalists who affirm God's timelessness. The argument, which focuses on the otherness of God (on non-finitist views), leads us to the conclusion that ordinary theological language is either false or meaningless on classical theism. (E.g., “God loves you” would either be false or meaningless.) This poses a major problem for the religious theist and destroys their ability to make predictions and inferences about God based on his attributes. This would not only undermine natural theology, but also harm the sorts of inferences we make about God in ordinary life.
*In the conversation, I use the word “prediction” at a few points where it probably would have been clearer to use the word “inference” instead.
*There is a lot of information packed into this episode; it may be beneficial to listen more than once.
Joseph's channel
SPECIAL THANKS TO JOSEPH NIED FOR THE MUSIC FOR THIS EPISODE
Support the show
*In the conversation, I use the word “prediction” at a few points where it probably would have been clearer to use the word “inference” instead.
*There is a lot of information packed into this episode; it may be beneficial to listen more than once.
Joseph's channel
SPECIAL THANKS TO JOSEPH NIED FOR THE MUSIC FOR THIS EPISODE
Support the show
105 episodes
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 504050980 series 2612571
Content provided by Audioboom and Emerson Green. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Audioboom and Emerson Green or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://podcastplayer.com/legal.
Does philosophy of language give us reason to think that God, if he exists, is more like us than classical theists expect? I’m joined by philosopher of language Joseph Lawal to discuss an argument from his paper, 'God An Alien or An Alien God?' His argument aims to push us away from the strongest versions of divine simplicity and aseity, but is also potentially a problem for theistic personalists who affirm God's timelessness. The argument, which focuses on the otherness of God (on non-finitist views), leads us to the conclusion that ordinary theological language is either false or meaningless on classical theism. (E.g., “God loves you” would either be false or meaningless.) This poses a major problem for the religious theist and destroys their ability to make predictions and inferences about God based on his attributes. This would not only undermine natural theology, but also harm the sorts of inferences we make about God in ordinary life.
*In the conversation, I use the word “prediction” at a few points where it probably would have been clearer to use the word “inference” instead.
*There is a lot of information packed into this episode; it may be beneficial to listen more than once.
Joseph's channel
SPECIAL THANKS TO JOSEPH NIED FOR THE MUSIC FOR THIS EPISODE
Support the show
*In the conversation, I use the word “prediction” at a few points where it probably would have been clearer to use the word “inference” instead.
*There is a lot of information packed into this episode; it may be beneficial to listen more than once.
Joseph's channel
SPECIAL THANKS TO JOSEPH NIED FOR THE MUSIC FOR THIS EPISODE
Support the show
105 episodes
All episodes
×Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.