Do you have a question or comment? Want to suggest a topic for our panel or be a guest on the Nova Society? Send us a message!

Today our question is from Spencer, who lives in Reno, NV, and Spencer asks Sometime next week, the SCOTUS will be hearing a case from Louisiana that is challenging the Voting Rights Act of (I think) 1963. In the past, the SCOTUS has pretty much weakened the Act over time. In a 1980 decision, the Supreme Court effectively concluded that only intentional discrimination violated the law. That decision drew significant criticism. Two years later, Congress amended the provision to sweep in voting laws that had a discriminatory effect, regardless of whether challengers could prove intent. The new language, crafted by the late Sen. Bob Dole, barred any voting practice that “results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.” Chief Justice John Roberts recently explained that “our country has changed” for the better. And that the deplorable conditions that prompted Congress to pass the voting rights law in the 1960s “no longer characterize voting in the covered jurisdictions.” Do you think Roberts is correct? If the SCOTUS sides with Louisiana, what might be the consequences for American Democracy?

Support the show

The Nova Society Podcast Season 4 every Monday - Friday!
Our Buzzsprout Home Landing Page
Direct SMS message to the podcast from the “message us” link on our page.
Support the Nova Society
Email us your Questions
Subscribe to our RSS Feed
Join Our Facebook Page & YouTube Channel
Past episodes & read our blog Here.
JCIS
Apple Podcasts/ I-Tunes
Spotify
Amazon Music
IHeart Radio
Podchaser
Deezer
Player FM
The Nova Society can be found on these and man...