InventionIP is a leading intellectual property service provider that specializes in creating high-quality patent and trademark drawings to help clients advance their applications. Visit us to learn more.
…
continue reading
Patent Application Podcasts
Patent Pending Made Simple is a podcast for inventors who are looking to learn more about the patent process
…
continue reading
Patent Bar Review
…
continue reading
Patent Law Legal News from LexisNexis® via Podcast
…
continue reading
The podcast where we bring you insights into the patent profession, so that you can understand if it might be the career path for you. Hosted by Senior Associate Ben Chapman, the series includes a range of guests from around the firm who share their experiences of working in IP.
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 332: Availability of provisional application relied on for priority and abandoned.
3:11
3:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:11Question: Is a provisional application that is relied upon for priority in a U.S. patent and is abandoned available through the Patent Center? Answer: Yes, a provisional application that is relied upon for priority in a U.S. patent and is abandoned may be available through the Patent Center. Generally though, provisional applications are not publis…
…
continue reading

1
Utility Patent Illustrations and the Patent Grant Process | InventionIP Podcast
7:06
7:06
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
7:06Learn how utility patent illustrations play a crucial role in the patent grant process. This episode breaks down why high-quality drawings are essential, what the USPTO requires, and how illustrations support your claims during examination. From technical compliance to real-world examples, discover how clear and accurate visuals can strengthen your…
…
continue reading

1
Why Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis Is Crucial Before Product Launch | InventionIP Podcast
6:23
6:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
6:23Learn why Freedom to Operate (FTO) analysis is a critical step before launching any product. This episode explores how FTO helps businesses avoid patent infringement, costly litigation, and market setbacks. Understand what an FTO analysis includes, when to conduct it, and how it supports strategic decision-making. Packed with practical insights and…
…
continue reading

1
How to File for Patent Invalidation with USPTO | IP Talks by InventionIP
8:00
8:00
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
8:00Learn how to file for patent invalidation with the USPTO in this episode of IP Talks by InventionIP. Discover the key legal grounds for challenging a patent, including lack of novelty, obviousness, and insufficient disclosure. Explore the different pathways like Inter Partes Review (IPR), Post-Grant Review (PGR), and Ex Parte Reexamination. Underst…
…
continue reading

1
Why Inventors Need a Patentability Search Before Filing | IP Talk by InventionIP
6:52
6:52
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
6:52Learn why a patentability search is a crucial first step before filing a patent application. This episode explores how identifying prior art early can help inventors avoid costly rejections, refine their ideas, and improve their chances of securing a patent. Understand the risks of skipping the search and how a professional assessment can guide sma…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 331: Does new ground of rejection raised by the Board in an appeal reopen prosecution?
3:00
3:00
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:00Question: Does the new ground of rejection raised by the Board in an appeal reopen prosecution? Answer: The new ground of rejection raised by the Board does not reopen prosecution except as to that subject matter to which the new rejection was applied. If the Board’s decision in which the rejection was made includes an affirmance […] The post MPEP …
…
continue reading

1
Patent Invalidity Search vs. Validity Search: Key Differences | InventionIP Podcast
6:46
6:46
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
6:46Discover the key differences between patent invalidity and validity searches in this insightful episode. Learn when each type of search is used, how they impact patent litigation, enforcement, and licensing, and why they are essential for defending or challenging patent rights. With real-world examples and strategic guidance, this episode is a valu…
…
continue reading

1
Can I Draw My Own Design Patent Drawings for the USPTO? | InventionIP
6:07
6:07
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
6:07Can you draw your own design patent drawings for the USPTO? This episode of the InventionIP Podcast explores what’s legally allowed, what the USPTO expects, and why precision is critical. Learn the risks of DIY drawings, the importance of meeting formal requirements, and when it’s worth hiring a professional. Whether you're a first-time inventor or…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 330: Items the Technology Center will verify when a Request for Continuing Examination is initially processed.
3:16
3:16
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:16Question: Name two items the Technology Center will verify when a Request for Continuing Examination is initially processed. Answer: An RCE will be initially processed by the Technology Center (TC) assigned the application. Technical support personnel in the TC will verify that: (A) the application is a utility or plant application (i.e., not a des…
…
continue reading

1
Difference Between Provisional and Non-Provisional Patent Drafting | InventionIP Podcast
7:13
7:13
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
7:13Discover the key differences between provisional and non-provisional patent drafting in this insightful episode by InventionIP. Learn when to file each type, what’s included in the applications, and how each impacts your patent strategy. Whether you're an inventor, startup founder, or IP professional, this episode offers clear, practical guidance t…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 329: Non-exhaustive factors to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period.
2:43
2:43
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:43Question: What non-exhaustive factors may be considered to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period? Answer: The following non-exhaustive factors may be considered to determine whether to accept a petition after the 2-month period: (1) Petitioner engaged in significant, constructive efforts with the examiner to resolve the is…
…
continue reading

1
How to Conduct a Product Clearance Search Before Launching a Product | InventionIP
5:48
5:48
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
5:48Learn how to protect your business before launching a new product with a product clearance search, also known as a Freedom to Operate (FTO) search. This episode explains what an FTO search is, why it matters, when to conduct one, and how it helps you avoid costly patent infringement risks. Whether you're developing tech, consumer goods, or medical …
…
continue reading

1
How to Perform a Patent Invalidity Search | InventionIP Podcast
5:26
5:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
5:26Explore the step-by-step process of performing a patent invalidity search in this in-depth podcast episode by InventionIP. Learn how to break down patent claims, identify relevant prior art, analyze its impact on patent validity, and strategically challenge issued patents. This episode provides practical insights for patent professionals, inventors…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 328: Reasons for insisting upon a restriction?
2:32
2:32
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:32Question: What are the reasons for insisting upon a restriction? Answer: Every requirement to restrict has two aspects: (A) the reasons (as distinguished from the mere statement of conclusion) why each inventionas claimed is either independent or distinct from the other(s); and (B) the reasons why there would be a serious search and/or examination …
…
continue reading

1
What’s Included in a Patentability Search Report | InventionIP Podcast
6:13
6:13
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
6:13Learn what’s included in a patentability search report and why it’s a crucial step before filing a patent. This episode covers the key components of the report—such as invention summaries, prior art findings, comparative analysis, and patentability opinions. Whether you're an inventor or entrepreneur, gain insights into how these reports help you d…
…
continue reading

1
What Does a Design Patent Protect? | IP Insight by InventionIP
5:55
5:55
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
5:55Discover what a design patent protects and how it differs from a utility patent in this episode of IP Insight by InventionIP. Learn how design patents safeguard the unique visual appearance of products—like shape, pattern, or surface design—and why they’re essential in industries where appearance matters. We also cover real-world examples, enforcem…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 327: Information submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid.
2:15
2:15
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:15Question: What information should also be submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid? Answer: The following information should also be submitted for each patent on which a maintenance fee or surcharge is paid: (A) the fee year (i.e., 3 1/2, 7 1/2, or 11 1/2 year fee); (B) the […] The post MPEP Q & A 327: Information s…
…
continue reading

1
How to Create Utility Patent Drawings for USPTO | InventionIP Podcast
6:11
6:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
6:11Discover how to create utility patent drawings that meet USPTO requirements in this episode of the InventionIP Podcast. Learn the key guidelines, common mistakes to avoid, and why professionally prepared drawings are essential for a successful patent application. Whether you're an inventor or entrepreneur, this episode offers practical insights to …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 326: Applications that count for “gross income” basis micro entity status.
2:44
2:44
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:44Question: What applications count for the filing limits for the purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis? Answer: For purposes of establishing micro entity status under the “gross income” basis, the application filing limit includes: (i) previously filed U.S. nonprovisional applications (e.g., utility, design, pla…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 325: List the pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest.
2:53
2:53
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:53Question: List two pieces of information that should be placed on the first page of a protest. Answer: Each protest should be clearly identified as a “PROTEST UNDER 37 CFR 1.291.” It is also important that any protest against a pending application specifically identify the application to which the protest is directed with the identification being […
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 324: Name items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date.
3:01
3:01
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:01Question: Name at least two items that must be submitted when adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date. Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: (1) a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text […] The post MPEP Q…
…
continue reading

1
20. Investing in Yourself as a Founder: A Talk With Jason Brown
32:40
32:40
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
32:40Summary In this episode, an M&A advisor and business broker, Jason Brown talks with Samar Shah about preparing a startup for a successful exit. He emphasizes the importance of having a clear vision and exit plan from the beginning, including various scenarios. He also discusses the benefits of inorganic growth through acquisitions and the need to b…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 323: Can distinct subject matter be recovered by filing a reissue application in specific cases?
3:19
3:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:19Question: Where a restriction (including an election of species) requirement was made in an application and applicant permitted the elected invention to issue as a patent without filing a divisional application on the non-elected invention(s) or on non-claimed subject matter distinct from the elected invention, can the non-elected invention(s) and …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 322: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter?
2:26
2:26
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:26Question: What type of Demand will prevent an international application designating the U.S. to enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office? Answer: An international application designating the U.S. will enter the national stage via the U.S. Designated Office unless a Demand electing the U.S. is filed under PCT Article 31 whereupon entr…
…
continue reading

1
19. Navigating 102 and 103 Rejections in Patent Applications
34:50
34:50
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
34:50Summary In this episode, the hosts discuss the different types of rejections that can be issued by the Patent Office when filing a patent application. They focus on 102 rejections, which are based on prior art, and 103 rejections, which are based on obviousness. They explain the timing of responding to rejections and the options for overcoming them…
…
continue reading

1
Discover IP: Navigating the application process
22:27
22:27
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
22:27In this episode host Ben Chapman is joined by Technical Assistants Maria Nikolova and Max Mallerman to talk about their experiences of applying to be a trainee patent attorney. They are also joined by Partner Anna Leathley who provides an insight into the application process at Carpmaels & Ransford.By Carpmaels & Ransford
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 321: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness?
3:41
3:41
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:41Question: What are the factual inquiries related to obviousness that the Court enunciates? Answer: Obviousness is a question of law based on underlying factual inquiries. The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: (A) Determining the scope and content of the prior art; (B) Ascertaining the differences between the claimed inventio…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 320: What are the three types of designs interpreted by case law to include?
2:22
2:22
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:22Question: What are the three types of designs the language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include? Answer: The language “new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture” has been interpreted by the case law to include at least three kinds of designs: […] …
…
continue reading

1
18. Zero Cost Patent Resources for Inventors
17:16
17:16
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
17:16Summary In this episode, Samar and Jamie discuss various resources for independent inventors. They highlight the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) website as a top resource, which provides information on patent basics, patent scams, and free services offered by the Patent Office. They also mention the Inventor Assistance Center and …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 319: What must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include?
2:11
2:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:11Question: What three items must any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile include? Answer: Any assignment-related document for patent matters submitted by facsimile must include: (A) an identified application or patent number; (B) one cover sheet to record a single transaction; and (C) payment of the recordation fee …
…
continue reading
Summary The conversation discusses New Year's resolutions for inventors with regards to the patent process. The main theme is taking advantage of the one-year timeframe while the provisional application is pending. This includes developing the invention, finding manufacturers or potential licensees, and determining a plan for monetizing the inventi…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 318: Requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63.
2:39
2:39
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:39Question: Name two requirements of an oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63? Answer: An oath or declaration under section 37 CFR 1.63 must: (1) Identify the inventor or joint inventor executing the oath or declaration by his or her legal name; (2) Identify the application to which it is directed; (3) Include a […] The post MPEP Q & A 318: R…
…
continue reading

1
16. How to Bring an Idea to Market: Product Development with Peter Drakulich of 52Launch
40:23
40:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
40:23In this episode, Jamie and Samar interview Peter Drakulich, co-founder of 52 Launch, a company that helps individuals bring product ideas to market. They discuss the journey of bringing product ideas to market, emphasizing the interplay of patents and market disclosure, comprehensive support services, and the value of leveraging platforms like Amaz…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 317: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application?
3:02
3:02
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:02Question: How can you determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied in a reissue application? Answer: Examiners should review the reissue application to determine whether the original patent requirement is satisfied, by considering if: (A) the claims presented in the reissue application are described in the original patent specific…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 316: Is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application?
3:52
3:52
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:52Question: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, is it ever necessary to change the inventorship named in the application? Answer: If an application by joint inventors includes more than one independent and distinct invention, and restriction is required, it may b…
…
continue reading

1
15. Exploring Patent Applications: A Detailed Overview
23:09
23:09
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
23:09In this episode, Samar and Jamie delve into the different types of patent applications, and the key information to remember for each one. There are 3 main types of applications -- design, utility, and plant. For utility patents, you may file a provisional or a non-provisional application as well. PCT applications make it possible to apply for a pat…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 315: List examples of situations that confirm a “real world” context of use.
3:11
3:11
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:11Question: List two examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably confirm a “real world” context of use and, therefore, do not define “substantial utilities.” Answer: The following are examples of situations that require or constitute carrying out further research to identify or reasonably …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 314: What will the request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request?
3:30
3:30
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:30Question: When an examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, they will prepare a decision denying the reexamination request. What will that request indicate for each patent and printed publication cited in the request? Answer: If the examiner concludes that no substantial new question of patentability has …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue.
2:19
2:19
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:19Question: Once the issue fee has been paid, list two reasons why the Office will withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative. Answer: Once the issue fee has been paid, the Office will not withdraw the application from issue at its own initiative for any reason except: (1) A mistake on the part […] The post MPEP Q & A 313: Reasons why …
…
continue reading

1
14. What to Do After Receiving a Notice of Allowance
20:32
20:32
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
20:32In this episode of Patent Pending Made Simple, Jaime and Samar tell you what a notice of allowance is, how it should be treated, and what you need to do after receiving one. Summary In this episode, the hosts discuss what to do after receiving a notice of allowance on a patent application. They explain a notice of allowance and how long it typicall…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 312: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors.
3:18
3:18
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:18Question: List two General Plastic non-exclusive factors. Answer: The General Plastic non-exclusive factors include the following: Whether the same petitioner previously filed a petition directed to the same claims of the same patent; Whether at the time of filing of the first petition the petitioner knew of the prior art asserted in the second pet…
…
continue reading
In this episode host Ben Chapman is joined by Technical Assistant Jenifer Milligan to talk about the transition from the world of academia to the world of intellectual property.By Carpmaels & Ransford
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 311: Two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a)
3:23
3:23
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:23Question: List two requirements for a petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a). Answer: A petition for suspension of action under 37 CFR 1.103(a) must: (A) be presented as a separate paper; (B) be accompanied by the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(g); (C) request a specific and reasonable period of suspension not greater than […
…
continue reading

1
13. Received a Rejection? What to do next: Amending Claims vs. Arguing
22:44
22:44
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
22:44In this Patent Pending Made Simple episode, Jaime and Samar debate whether to amend claims or argue against rejections in a patent application. It is common to receive rejections in the patent process, but determining whether or not you should fight those rejections or amend claims in your application is a difficult dance. Listen in to get some ins…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 310: List two examples of notices issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application
3:29
3:29
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:29Question: The three-month period in 37 CFR 1.704(b) applies to the Office notices and letters issued as part of the pre-examination processing of an application (except a Notice of Omitted Items in a Nonprovisional Application as discussed above). List two examples of these notices. Answer: These notices include: A Notice of Incomplete Nonprovision…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 309: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date?
3:15
3:15
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:15Question: List two requirements for adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date? Answer: Adding a “Sequence Listing” after the application filing date involves the submission of: a “Sequence Listing” either as a PDF image file, on physical sheets of paper, or as an ASCII plain text file submitted via the USPTO patent electronic [……
…
continue reading

1
12. The Complexities of Determining Inventorship
15:57
15:57
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
15:57Who is an inventor when it comes to a patent? Can there be multiple inventors? What rights do they have? These questions will be answered in this insightful episode of Patent Pending Made Simple, where our hosts, Jamie Brophy and Samar Shah, delve into the intricacies of inventorship claims and their implications in the realm of patent applications…
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 308: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include?
3:35
3:35
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
3:35Question: What type of arguments should a patent owner preliminary response include? Answer: A patent owner preliminary response may include one or more of the following arguments: The petitioner is statutorily barred from pursuing a review; The references asserted to establish that the claims are unpatentable are not in fact printed publications; …
…
continue reading

1
MPEP Q & A 307: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted?
2:55
2:55
Play later
Play later
Lists
Like
Liked
2:55Question: When are electronic means or medium for filing IDSs permitted? Answer: As shown in chapter 600 … Electronic means or medium for filing IDSs are not permitted except for: IDSs electronically submitted using the USPTO patent electronic filing system; or copies of large tables, computer program listings, and sequence listings submitted as a …
…
continue reading
What are the key differences between a patent attorney and a patent agent? In this episode, Jamie and Samar dispel the myths surrounding patent attorneys and patent agents. They specify the qualifications a patent attorney and patent agent must have and what actions fall under their jurisdictions, respectively. Takeaways: Both patent attorneys and …
…
continue reading